Search for: "Governing Board v. Phillips"
Results 181 - 200
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
On the merger front, for example, the DOJ has challenged Penguin Random House’s proposed acquisition of Simon & Schuster on the ground that the deal would supposedly reduce competition for publishing rights and suppress compensation paid to authors.17 The FTC has also had several recent high profile investigations and settlements of labor organizations, including the Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama and the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
And, while not an employment case, Fisher v University of Texas at Austin reflected the Court’s continuing willingness to revisit the wisdom of affirmative action, tightening the standards by which the government may implement race-conscious actions. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
AstraZeneca v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
The latest offering from the jiplp weblog, which offers free extracts from the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (JIPLP), is this Current Intelligence note by editorial board member Charles Macedo on patent eligibility in the US and the protection of abstract ideas, arising from Research Corporation Technologies Inc v Microsoft Corp. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:32 am
In Tucker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
Testimony of Phillip C. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Even in the context of prevention of secrecy in government, "the public interest in protecting the privacy of noise complainants and in preventing a chilling effect on complaints, clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure of complainants' names…" City of San Jose v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
All property tax limitations have the potential not only to constrain the growth of government, but also to drive a shift to other local taxes or to greater reliance on state government. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Discussion of Catherine Tremblay’s article on cost approach: (IP finance), US Congress cites free expression as reason ICANN must remain controlled by US government: (IP Justice), A new organisation around IP in your company? [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Phillips, TC Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland, Australia To protect consumers, governments should step in to address the risks of DNA testing. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
In that case, the plaintiff, Chris Gordon, head of security with the Irish Horseracing Regulatory Board (IHRB), had been the subject of an orchestrated and severe campaign against his good name by the defendants, the Irish Racehorse Trainers Association (the IRTA). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
A day after rebel-held elections in eastern Ukraine, NATO’s top military commander, General Phillip M. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
