Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor" Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Windsor - The DOMA Case Now, let's look at United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am by Marissa Miller
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Adam Kielich
Specifically, this holding affects spousal rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that governs health and retirement benefits and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that governs medical leave. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:57 am
British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union [1999]For Rubin, this case in particular was “a game changer. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Holland & Hart
  Place of Celebration to Govern  Under the current FMLA regulations, the definition of spouse is based on the state where the employee resides, not on the state where the employee was married. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:55 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tibble v Edison, now up before the Supreme Court, and the history of excessive fee class action litigation presents a nice way of looking at this phenomenon. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers should move quickly to review and update as necessary their human resources and employee benefit policies and practices concerning when same-sex partners of employees are treated as the spouses of the employees in light of the United States Supreme Court’s June 26, 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
First, as applied to the federal government, RFRA falls within Congress’s enumerated powers, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Boerne v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am by Joy Waltemath
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and, thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:36 am by Tom Smith
Then, of course, there were also terms in which the court upheld the charging of fees by unions to government employees who did not wish to join (Abood v. [read post]
(Although as a general matter, voting within state and local government must follow the one-person, one-vote rule of Reynolds v. [read post]