Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 21 - 40
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm
Same-Sex Marriage: Windsor and Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Windsor - The DOMA Case Now, let's look at United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:04 pm
(Dale Carpenter) The effect of United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Windsor, a U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Specifically, this holding affects spousal rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that governs health and retirement benefits and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that governs medical leave. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:18 am
In Koutros v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:57 am
British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union [1999]For Rubin, this case in particular was “a game changer. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:33 am
The case is called Boucher v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Place of Celebration to Govern Under the current FMLA regulations, the definition of spouse is based on the state where the employee resides, not on the state where the employee was married. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
Tibble v Edison, now up before the Supreme Court, and the history of excessive fee class action litigation presents a nice way of looking at this phenomenon. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Employers should move quickly to review and update as necessary their human resources and employee benefit policies and practices concerning when same-sex partners of employees are treated as the spouses of the employees in light of the United States Supreme Court’s June 26, 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
DOJ reports on post-Windsor efforts. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
The court in Himmelsetin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
First, as applied to the federal government, RFRA falls within Congress’s enumerated powers, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Boerne v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In a greatly anticipated and deeply divided opinion, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that lawfully married same-sex couples are entitled to the equal protection of the laws pursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution and, thus, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) must fall (United States v Windsor, June 26, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 2675 2013). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:36 am
Then, of course, there were also terms in which the court upheld the charging of fees by unions to government employees who did not wish to join (Abood v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:04 pm
Windsor. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
(Although as a general matter, voting within state and local government must follow the one-person, one-vote rule of Reynolds v. [read post]
