Search for: "Grand Jury No. 84-3, Matter of"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F.3d 171, 179, 183-84 (6th Cir. 2009). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
A federal grand jury in New York returned an indictment charging Yudong Zhu with “conspiring to commit honest services fraud in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
(Tr. 83–84, 181; 416.) [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
The dismissal of this First Degree Murder case are a sign that common sense does still exist in Maricopa Law and is the culmination of over 3 years of heartache for Lisa and her family. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
It shall be no defense to a prosecution for a violation of subparagraph (a) or (b) of paragraph (3) of this subsection that the defendant was unaware that the prohibit [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 2008): Limits patentable subject matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
In that sense, the first jury acts as a de facto grand jury rather than a true factfinder. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Leis, No. 063949, 063950, 064039 In a grand jury indictment for offenses including aggravated burglary, kidnaping, receiving stolen property, and having a weapon while under a disability, denial of writ of habeas corpus based on an alleged double jeapordy violation is affirmed where: 1) the trial judge exercise the requisite "sound discretion"; and 2) the trial judge did not contrary to Supreme Court precedent when he delcared a mistrial. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 10:18 am
After a determination by a magistrate or a grand jury that probable cause exists for the arrest, a sample shall be taken prior to the person's release from custody. [read post]
