Search for: "Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
A few weeks later, on February 25, a trial judge in Manhattan ruled in Beth R. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), while the state argued that Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:20 am
The leading recent case in Kentucky is Jones v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:52 pm
Also, in Columbia Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on another of yesterday’s grants, Madison v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Section 9026.5 achieves these purposes by authorizing Assembly video footage to be used as a public service by providing Californians direct access to “gavel-to-gavel” proceedings of the California Legislature “where public policy is discussed, debated, and decided — all without editing, commentary, or analysis …. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
She made minimal progress with her service plan. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Federal redistricting lines drawn by an independent commission were being employed in Arizona for over a decade prior to the Court’s blessing their use in the Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Sanchez, 997 S.W.2d 584, 592 (Tex. 1999); Hyundai Motor Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
As always, it lists the petitions on the Court’s paid docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
CVSG Information Invited: May 16, 2011 Filed: August 25, 2011 (Grant) Briefs and Documents Certiorari-stage documents Opinion below (5th Cir.) [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
FlightSafety Services Corporation, Co. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
The cold streak for rescheduled cases continues, as two of last week’s group were denied without comment: Carpenter Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
As anticipated, the court granted review in one-time relist Diaz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cert Granted Update.Lucent v. [read post]
