Search for: "Grant v. Harris et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted a motion to compel arbitration in Hoeg et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:08 am
The Court was asked to determine whether a 1940 deed from Harris et al to Lopoo conveying a tract in Reeves County, Texas, reserved a cost-free royalty interest or a cost-bearing non-executive mineral interest. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm
Optimal Designs Incorporated et al., Case No. 202215877, in the 189th District Court of Harris County, Texas). [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:58 am
Acuteye-US, et al. is a case in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
CMP et al. had no First Amendment right to break the laws they broke. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
For example, the Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm
But I do believe Justice Alito, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm
KITREANA GRANT-VAN BROCKLIN, et al., Appellees. 3rd District. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
See Brief for Amicus Curiae MacArthur Justice Center, et al. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991), but advised that its grant of authority for that particular deposition should not be considered precedent, and China has not permitted a deposition since. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
TAKINGS Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
NATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
