Search for: "Grant v. Pfizer Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 4:47 pm
Sepracor Inc (EPLAW) Zyvox (Linezolid) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed following a Paragraph IV certification: Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
BCE Inc. et al (T-113-18), under reserve Rovi Guides, Inc. et al v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(“Halliburton II”),[ii] which held that defendants have the right to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance created by Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Camco Inc. (1997), 72 C.P.R. (3d) 444 (F.C.T.D.)). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
(Patent Docs) Detrol LA (Tolterodine) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed in response to Para IV certification: Pfizer, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004) (dictum also extends rule to medical devices). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am by kylew
  Intel Corp., Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer Inc. were among the companies that supported Roche. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
(Property intangible) US: Supreme Court rules 9-0 that CAFC has jurisdiction to review case remanded by district court to state court: Carlsbad Technology Inc v HIF Bio, Inc et al (Managing Intellectual Property) (Patently-O) US: Anticipation by a laundry list of prophetic DNA sequences: In re Gleave (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Reverse payment settlements and biotechnology (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Biogen seeks review and correction of patent term… [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
GuestKats and InternKat | “Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The court was asked to decide what the limits are to the principle under which a solicitor can ask the Court to grant an equitable lien in order to protect his entitlement to fees as against his client. [read post]