Search for: "Grant v. Thomas"
Results 61 - 80
of 6,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 11:10 am
In the second, Jiminez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 2:15 pm
Fletcher, Murguia, and Nguyen would grant the petition for review. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:51 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:26 pm
Donaldson: Judge Thomas Woodall affirmed the trial court's grant of a motion to suppress evidence seized after a traffic violation stop.Word v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Connick v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:52 pm
Justice Thomas, writing for the 7-2 majority, explained that a grant of a patent is a matter involving a public right. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:02 am
Twombly and Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
In Malama Solomon et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
Hall, the Court granted cert, vacated, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Cone v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:25 pm
Supreme Court has granted cert. yet again in Philip Morris v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:30 pm
Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch would not have dismissed the petitions. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 7:10 am
New grants could, however, still come in an order list expected sometime this afternoon. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:14 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States today granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
The Supremes have docketed a new military cert petition in the case of Thomas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:50 am
This morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Gonzalez v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
It may encourage further debate in the legal academy about the future of New York Times v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:26 pm
By Thomas James, Minnesota attorney In Fourth Estate Public Benefits Corp. v. [read post]
