Search for: "Graves v. Department Of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 6:43 am
This error is egregious in itself, but the greater problem is it’s not an isolated incident throughout the state – and it puts vulnerable patients at grave risk of serious harm. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:58 pm
On August 12, 2015, however, the STEM OPT program received a grave blow when a U.S. district court in Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
While acknowledging the success of the law in greatly increasing the number of African-American and Latino elected officials, Chief Justice John Roberts contended in his majority opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Related Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
Paylor, a Vietnam veteran, who had worked with the recreations department, had been a corrections officer, and recently retired from the Department of Transportation, testified that he and Cameron had been friends `most of my life. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm
In that case, an official in the department of correctional services was convicted of contempt for stating that a judge had acted erroneously in granting bail to Eugene Terre’Blanche, the former leader of the Afrikanerweerstandsbeweging. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
National Security Judge Shedd’s dissent, which was joined by Judges Niemeyer and Agee, charged that the majority opinion disregards the “potentially grave consequences for our country. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:50 am
City of New York Department of Corrections et al.,09-2634-cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;010 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm
FTC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
McNEIL, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondents. ____________________________________/ PETITION SEEKING TO INVOKE THIS COURT'S ALL WRITS JURISDICTION AND/OR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS I. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:07 pm
” That they “acted in this way for motives of political correctness, political cowardice, or political selfishness”, and That each “was thereby guilty of misconduct so grave that it was or should be criminal, as it aided and abetted the perpetrators and made the Claimants just as culpable as the perpetrators. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am
This could gravely imperil future diplomatic relations with foreign states. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The Court of Appeal held this to be a correct state of the law and their Lordships agree. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
There was no question that the hearing officers findings were correct; Petitioner was guilty of all charges and specifications. [read post]
