Search for: "Graves v. Phillips"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 9:42 am
Read the entire opinion here:Phillips v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:49 am
See McGovern v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:37 am
The Court of Appeals holds that plaintiff has a case against Barton under the New York City Human Rights Law.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
Central District Denies Final Approval of Honda Hybrid Class Settlement: True v. Am. Honda Motor Co.
19 Mar 2010, 8:29 am
Phillips, entered a detailed order denying final settlement approval in True v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Norris v United States [2010] UKSC 9 SC (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Judge, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr) 24 February 2010 In determining whether interference with an individual’s right to a family life was justified to achieve the aim of extradition, the court should not consider whether the circumstances were exceptional but should consider whether the consequences were exceptionally serious SUMMARY The appellant had recently… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:12 pm
Phillips, 865 F.3d 277, 282-83 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting Delgado v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
This court’s decision in Phillips v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
In Granata v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
In Granata v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’ Graves had five dogs of his own. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:32 am
This court’s decision in Phillips v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Lord Phillips queries whether, on the facts, there is sufficient control. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” A trial court’s grant of a CPLR 4401 motion for judgment as a matter of law is appropriate where the trial court finds that, upon the evidence presented, there is no rational process by which the fact trier could base a finding in favor of the nonmoving party'” (Geeta Temple-Ashram v Satyanandji, 142 AD3d 1132, 1134, quoting Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 556; accord Clarke v Phillips, 112 AD3d 872, 874). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
PHILLIPS: Yes. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
There's also a quick-off-the-mark piece by IPKat team blogger Jeremy on a recent reminder from the European Court of Justice that, while the sui generis database right was buried some years ago, it seems to be rising from the grave. [read post]
