Search for: "Green v. Brown" Results 121 - 140 of 640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 6:06 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘The mere identity of a client itself is something that can be privileged,’ said John Browning, a Spencer Fane trial partner. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
…and you’ll get something like today’s opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
The court disagreed and pointed out that the originality requirement for copyright protection is quite low while going on to explain that “although a banana costume is likely to be yellow, it could be any shade of yellow—or green or brown for that matter. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and Texas Department of Community Affairs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
Although he could not be reinstated to that term of office as it had expired, the court ruled that he was entitled to compensation for the remainder of his term ending December 31, 2008.Justice Rumsey then explored the County Legislature's authority to appoint an individual to the position of Election Commissioner.* An element not discussed in this opinion is the standard set Ryan v Green, 58 NY 295, with respect to the issue of one person holding two public offices… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:14 am
Although he could not be reinstated to that term of office as it had expired, the court ruled that he was entitled to compensation for the remainder of his term ending December 31, 2008.Justice Rumsey then explored the County Legislature’s authority to appoint an individual to the position of Election Commissioner.* An element not discussed in this opinion is the standard set Ryan v Green, 58 NY 295, with respect to the issue of one person holding two public offices… [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
D/B/A FORT BROWN CONDOSHARES AND LRI MANAGEMENT, INC. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Chancery Court recently green-lighted key parts of an investment company’s suit against officers and owners who allegedly inflated their I.T. and data center services provider’s worth, finding the buyer plaintiff was more likely the victim of fraud and breach of contract rather than mere buyer’s remorse in LightEdge Holdings LLC, et al. v. [read post]