Search for: "Green v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 4:59 am by Jeff Welty
A superior court judge denied the motion, and the defendant was convicted and appealed. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 880, 892 [“the California Constitution amply established the existence of a fundamental public policy”]; see Green v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Matt C. Bailey
Superior Court, 141 Cal.App.4th 290 (2006), an opinion issued just prior to the California Supreme Court granted review in Tobacco II. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:32 am
’ Following a hearing, the trial court granted the motion to suppress, and the Commonwealth appealed to Superior Court.Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by John Rubin
App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Dec. 3, 2019) The defendant was charged with impaired driving, was convicted in district court, appealed to superior court, and prevailed on a motion to suppress at a pretrial hearing in superior court. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by Jacquelyn Greene
Greene, 294 N.C. 418 (1978) (two sexual assaults in the span of three hours), and State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The Plan To Make The Planet Green In Cooperation With China President Barack Obama committed his Administration soon after his election in November 2008 to the development of green technologies. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
The superior court also granted a CR 54(b) certification.West v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 am by M Bates
I must write a quick commentary on the just-released judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:47 pm
However, before any claim that the Canadian appointments process is in fact superior can be made or defended, it is necessary to understand what these findings imply about the judicial decision-making process and quality of adjudication by our Court relative to the US Supreme Court. [read post]