Search for: "Greenberg v. New York State"
Results 41 - 60
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am
“The court declines to dismiss plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice pursuant to CPLR § 321 l(a)(l), on the basis of plaintiffs llocution under oath, because New York State courts have not taken a consistent position on whether an allocution that a client was satisfied with the services of his/her attorney precludes a client from bringing a claim for legal malpractice (See Boone v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Corp. v Denenberg ,2020 NY Slip Op 32572(U) August 6, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 160882/2019 Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
LIFE declared the New York state precautions to be “[a] triumph of preventative medicine. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:30 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that some of the works on the site were of “recognized stature” and that Wolkoff willfully violated VARA in destroying them. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:29 am
, Inc., 174 A.D.3d 682, 102 N.Y.S.3d 687 [2 Dept., 2019], citing Greenberg v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
§ 117(a)Choice of LawAppeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.), dismissing plaintiffʹs claims for breach of contract, copyright infringement, misappropriation, and unfair competition arising from its sale of equipment and software for an automated assembly system. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
New York Yankees, in particular the litigation involving Curt Flood that ultimately led to the free agency era of professional baseball. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v… [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 12:27 pm
That’s because an old case from the Ohio Supreme Court (State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The former New York mayor logged a decade with the law and lobbying firm then known as Bracewell & Giuliani and a two-year stint after that with Greenberg Traurig. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
Greenberg, president-elect of the New York State Bar Association, is now available. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:34 am
” Liability for attorney deceit existed at New York common law before the first New York statute governing such behavior was enacted, and thus, is subject to the six year statute of limitation’s for actions for which no limitation is specifically provided by law (Melcher v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
Perhaps it’s because New York is the center of the legal universe and the home state of thousands of law firms. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:38 am
Paul Ferrillo In the following guest post, Paul Ferrillo, a partner in the law firm Greenberg Traurig LLP in New York City, takes a look a six recurring problems that directors can have with their D&O insurance and how to avoid them. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
” ‘On December 7, 2017, the approximately 30 paragraph settlement agreement was read into the record in front of New York State Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court, agreed to state out loud that the plaintiffs’ “every exposure” theory had no clothes, no foundation, and no science. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 1:43 pm
SUNY Buffalo, decided a week ago by a New York appellate court: Petitioner, an undergraduate student at respondent State University of New York at Buffalo, commenced ... [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Because the record on equitable estoppel was incomplete, it remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with the decision.Appellate Divison, Second DepartmentIncome tax liability of the parties is subject to equitable distributionIn Greenberg v Greenberg, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2018 WL 3041099, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Because the record on equitable estoppel was incomplete, it remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with the decision.Appellate Divison, Second DepartmentIncome tax liability of the parties is subject to equitable distributionIn Greenberg v Greenberg, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2018 WL 3041099, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
