Search for: "Griffith v. Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2012, 8:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Brown, writing for the Court, concluded the answer is “no,” joined by Chief Judge Sentelle, and Judges Henderson, Griffith and Garland. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:11 pm
,Appellees BEFORE: Sentelle*, Chief Judge, and Ginsburg*, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel,Garland, Brown, Griffith*, and Kavanaugh*, Circuit Judges O R D E R Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc and the responses thereto werecirculated to the full court, and a vote was requested. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm by Orin Kerr
Judge Sentelle wrote one dissent that was joined by Judges Henderson, Brown, and Kavanaugh, and Judge Kavanaugh wrote a second dissent. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Cleveland lawyer Karen Rubin of Thompson Hine on the firm’s blog, The Law for Lawyers Today Nestlé v Cadbury: Is this the break that KitKat needs? [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
In re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., et al., PetitionersJudges: Griffith, Kavanaugh, Srinivasan Arguing: John P. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am by Josh Blackman
The Court decided 5 cases today, still no Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The argument took place before a panel consisting of Judges David Sentelle, Janice Brown, and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The en banc panel includes Judges Merrick Garland, Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith Rogers, David Tatel, Janice Rogers Brown, Thomas Griffith, and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 4:05 pm
  Before she became a judge, Judge Motley worked as a staff attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, and she was the only woman to serve on the Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am by The Blog Team
In a split opinion featuring an interesting alignment (Circuit Judges Rogers and Griffith comprising the majority with Circuit Judge Brown vigorously dissenting) the Circuit overturned Appellant’s ten year mandatory minimum sentence for possessing 68 grams of crack cocaine. [read post]