Search for: "Grogan v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Volunteer ambulance organization held not a “state actor” for the purposes of the Fourteenth AmendmentGrogan v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
After briefing was completed in this case and while a decision was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is a case decided by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Considerations for Employees In the United States, employers generally are free to prospectively change an employee’s terms and conditions of employment, subject to compliance with contractual obligations and, where applicable, collective-bargaining restrictions. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/29/10-99021o.pdf United State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
United Kingdom case 804/79 John Temple Lang    17. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:53 am by Amy Howe
Bill Crawford, the petitioner in Crawford v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]