Search for: "H & H Wholesale Servs., Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Here's one to keep an eye out for: Wholesale Justice,Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit by Martin H. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
And here's how Judge Callahan's opinion (accurately) describes that precedent:  "Twenty-nine years ago, in Actmedia, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
It ends with a consideration of key trends and developments going forward.COURSE CONCEPT STATEMENT:Two questions dominated a century-long debate about the economic, social, and political role of economic actors operating in corporate form: Whom must corporations serve and to what extent should the regulation of corporations be left to the market, to private ordering (contract law) among corporate stakeholders, or to public regulation by the state? [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
He therefore directed an election in a unit limited to VMT technicians. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Justice O’Connor wrote for the majority, which Justice Stevens joined, in the 1985 6-3 opinion in Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]