Search for: "HARRIS et al. v. GRAY et al."
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2018, 5:37 am
EXLP Leasing, et al tracked perfectly the issues and holdings of EXLP v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
No. 893 (S.C.); Harris v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:02 pm
Moore Medical Corp., 524 U.S. 74 (1998) (Monday); June 10, 1996 – Lockheed Corp. et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Cerro Wire, et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
[et al.] ; edited by Junwei Fu, Jacob S. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
See Brief for Amicus Curiae MacArthur Justice Center, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
