Search for: "HARRIS v AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INS" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am by Administrator
Supreme issues its opinion in Pilot Life Ins. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
 See Nixon, 690 S.W.2d at 548-49.The disposition of the affidavit issue mirrors an earlier case involving American Express, in which the defendant, a former Harris County district court judge, had also filed a controverting affidavit, in which he denied having received the cardmember agreement on which the bank moved for summary judgment, and had specially denied that he had consented to the interest rates charged by American Express. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
Supp.3d 1, 11 (D.D.C. 2013) (“there has been a sea change in the manner in which computers, which now contain enormous amounts of data, are searched with technology assisted review replacing other forms of searching, including the once thought gold standard of file-by-file and document-by-document review”) (footnote omitted); Harris v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 26 April 2022 Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of HM Attorney-General v BBC. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
They addressed specific causation inferences from what is generally known as differential etiology. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission:… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Santillana, No. 06-1276 A sentence for using a firearm during, and in relation to, a drug trafficking offense is affirmed where: 1) defendant was not challenging the reasonableness of the sentence; and 2) the circuit court generally does not review a district court's decision not to depart downward, and no exception to that rule applied here. .. [read post]