Search for: "HARRIS v. ARTHUR et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2006, 8:03 am
Jack Harris, et al. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
On September 3, 2009, twenty-five corporate law and finance professors and scholars - including several contributors to this blog - filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Jones et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:07 pm
Conference of November 7, 2008 __________________ Docket: 08-146 Title: Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOGGINS; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00368-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-20-07)08-0276 DANIEL ROEHRS, ET AL. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Lemmon, et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
MONADNOCK CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellees. 3rd District. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
[et al.] [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Rev. 835-889 (2010).ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
[et al.] ; edited by Junwei Fu, Jacob S. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm
Rogers, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL 891405. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Keith Sullivan Team Members: Arthur Muller (3L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Kiera Fitzpatrick (3L), Alex Zugaro (3L) The competition involved a criminal case of the United States of America v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
