Search for: "HAYES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2009, 8:56 am
Hayes," and here is the abstract: In District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 8:56 am
Hayes," and here is the abstract: In District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:01 am
Supreme Court in Bradwell v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
On Friday District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg issued an opinion reaffirming his ruling striking down the National Labor Relations Board's "quickie election" rules in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
The NLRB has filed a motion asking District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg to amend his ruling that struck down the Board’s election reform rules because the Board did not have a quorum of three members when it passed the new rules. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:07 pm
In a decision issued a few minutes ago, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the NLRB’s new election rules because the Board lacked a quorum when it attempted to adopt the final rule. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:30 pm
" Here is the abstract: This Symposium Essay examines the Supreme Court's Second Amendment decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:17 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia has found the National Labor Relations Board’s expedited representation election rule invalid because the Board lacked a quorum when it issued the rule in December 2011. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:44 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia voided the NLRB’s so-called “quickie election” rules because the NLRB lacked the quorum necessary when it adopted its Amended Election Rules to expedite the current union election process. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:47 am
You’ll remember that after the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:14 am
” Lockwood had been practicing law in the District of Columbia and qualified as the first female attorney to appear before the Court, in the 1880 case Kaiser v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Hayes, Esq., New York, NY, MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A., By: Clay M. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:46 pm
“Keep,” the Trump Administration contended, implies that the right to have a firearm inside the perimeters of someone’s house, but that isn’t the part the brief wants to argue; It’s the right to “bear” that is being challenged due to infringements of the strict policies.The Trump Administration brought up as an example a very famous case Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:41 pm
On July 27, 2012, Judge Boasberg of the District of Columbia Federal District Court denied the NLRB’s Motion in U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:48 am
§ 922(g)(9) in light of District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
He is lead counsel on an amicus brief for 45 states and the District of Columbia in support of Washington and Colorado in Chiafalo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Fifty years ago today, Chief Justice Warren delivered the unanimous decision of the court; within that decision was this statement: In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
Lerner & Nelson Lund The District of Columbia v. [read post]
