Search for: "HICKS v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
Mary’s Honor Center v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
Hicks v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 9:14 am
Dominic Crossley is a Partner of Payne Hicks Beach within the Privacy & Media Law Team. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Hicks v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Hicks, 539 U.S. 113, 119 (2003). [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
http://j.st/GqZ United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:53 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:17 am
” Agostino v Hicks, 845 A2d 1110, 1121 (Del Ch 2004) (cited in Tooley, 845 A2d at 1036). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
State Bar gave Rick something of a victory, though the release of the records is by no means guaranteed:Appellants Richard Sander, Joe Hicks and the California First Amendment Coalition seek access to admissions records from the State Bar of California (the Bar), subject to conditions designed to ensure the privacy of bar applicants, in order to conduct academic research on discrepancies in bar passage rates among racial and ethnic groups. [read post]
