Search for: "HILL V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 4:19 pm
In the 2023 case Chestnut Hill NY, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the Court to use Coleman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the Court to use Coleman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
Merit Systems Protection Board, in which the justices will decide on the proper form for civil service review in mixed cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:48 pm
It does so by establishing a limited system for case-by-case oversight in which judicial review of the substantive merits of those decisions is avoided. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
I am telling my story here to highlight the history behind whistleblower protections that have been legislated since Enron’s collapse and the efforts by some to dismantle those protections. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
First up is Kahler v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
Marstiller and its implications for the personal injury compensation system. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
Department of the Treasury, in which the Court held that the Merit Systems Protection Board provided the exclusive forum for judicial review of adverse employment action against government employees covered by the Civil Service Reform Act, including when the employees bring constitutional claims that the MPSB lacks the authority to decide. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
Rock Hill Local Sch. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
Hall J., in Schuster v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Biological Metaphors for Whiteness: Beyond Merit and Malice Brant T. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
The appellate opinion merits a careful review, but a few initial definitions are in order. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
Merit Systems Protection Board, in which the justices held that district court is the proper forum for a “mixed” case, involving both adverse action and discrimination, that is dismissed by the MSPB on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
(relisted after the October 5 conference) Returning Relists Quality Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am
CPR board member, Sid Shapiro, is a law professor at Wake Forest. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
” It has to be said that there is some merit in that position. [read post]
