Search for: "HILL v. MERRELL et al"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2015, 6:41 am
Ries et al., the Court of Appeals reversed a defense verdict in favor of the physician finding that testimony from an expert was not scientifically reliable under Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 2:46 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993). [5] General Electric Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
See id. at 10 n. 3 (citing Anders Grøntved, et al., “Television Viewing and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, and All-Cause Mortality, 305 J. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Ahmed-Saucedo’s dismissal of the importance of a dose-response relationship, another Hill factor, as unimportant sealed her fate. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm
Carl v. [read post]
