Search for: "HTC Corporation "
Results 101 - 120
of 264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 8:20 am
—both of Libertyville, Illinois—as well as HTC Corporation of Taiwan and HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 2:36 am
Bartlett; assigned to Digital Equipment Corporation; filed in June 1991)Next year we'll see if this request for reexamination is granted. [read post]
HTC Attack on FlashPoint Image Capture Patent Among the Reexamination Requests Filed Week of Jan 9th
17 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
HTC et al. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:52 pm
Flashpoint’s complaint originally named Respondents Nokia Corp. and Nokia, Inc.; Research in Motion Ltd. and Research in Motion Corp.; HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, LG Electronics USA, Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
According to the Order, non-settling Respondents HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:48 pm
District Court for the District of Delaware against HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. involving the ‘471, ‘538, ‘575, and ‘190 patents. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:58 am
Defendant HTC was a Washington corporation with its principal place of business in Washington, and defendant Sony was a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Georgia. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. of… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:29 pm
Centrify Corporation et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
"As Samsung, HTC, Acer and other companies have recognized, respecting others’ intellectual property through licensing is the right path forward. [read post]
ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-836) Regarding Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices
9 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
Apple has moved forward with litigation against rivals like HTC and Samsung, both of which use Google’s Android operating system, Corporate Counsel notes. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:21 am
We have so far this year seen employee layoffs in China by such well-known companies as Lenovo, Samsung, HTC, Yahoo, and Zynga China. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
The action and investigation initiated by the ITC include Motorola Mobility, Inc. and HTC Corporation (HTC), whose products incorporate the alleged infringing RF ICs. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:07 pm
Numerous device makers (including Samsung, HTC, LG and Acer) as well as contract manufacturers have previously taken such a license from Microsoft. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
Multiple instances from Plaintiff’s corporate representative’s deposition testimony supported this argument. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: • Acer Inc. of Taiwan • Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California • Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington • Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York • Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland • Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas • Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:55 am
Essex issued the public version of Order No. 34 (dated February 6, 2012) granting Complainant Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) motion for summary determination that it satisfies the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:44 pm
Those seven pages dealt with an issue that Marshall recognized had to be addressed before he decided whether a corporation was a causally “necessary” (or otherwise “proper”) means for implementing federal powers. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is HTC Corporation (“HTC”) and the Respondent is Apple, Inc. [read post]
