Search for: "HUGHES v. MARTIN." Results 81 - 100 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes   McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild   Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw  Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins  Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester Mackesys… [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The conclusion of IN RE HUGH EDWARD MONTGOMERY, JOHN FRANCIS MARTIN, and JORGE DANIEL ERUSALIMSKY  : We thus affirm the rejection of claims 42, 43, and 45 of the ’824 application as anticipated by HOPE. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Journalist Lauren Collins interviewed editor Paul Dacre (“he still doesn’t have a computer in his office“) and Mail Online editor Martin Clarke. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  So far as books by Justices are concerned, this new offering is more refined, extensive, and current than what had appeared previously in Fenton Martin and Robert Goehlert’s The U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
  A 17 judge court (with 3 substitute judges) presided over by Belgian Judge, Françoise Tulkens, heard oral submissions from Martin Chamberlain on behalf of the United Kingdom Government and Hugh Tomlinson QC on behalf of the Applicant. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am by INFORRM
Speakers included Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, PA Media Lawyer editor Mike Dodd and the journalist Heather Brooke. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
A new proposal for a “Media Standards Authority” has been drafted by Hugh Tomlinson QC, following discussions between academics, journalists and lawyers brought together by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the Media Standards Trust. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The messages showed Foster saying he had managed to stand up the story with information about Horton from the public domain, after Brett and then home news editor Martin Barrow expressed concern over the orig [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:03 am by Giesela Ruehl
WORKSHOP (with coffee & tea) 15:15 Life-cycle of a contract: a case study on the CESL in legal practice Martin Schmidt-Kessel 17:00 End of the first conference day 19:00 Evening programme and dinner Friday, 10 February 2012 Chair: Anna Veneziano V. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]