Search for: "HUMPHREYS v. DAY" Results 41 - 60 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 10:51 am by Thorsten Bausch
Here is Mike’s report: Isentress II, decision on royalty rate in Merck v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm by John Elwood
”  Indeed, the case was decided on the day (May 27, 1935) that “became known as Roosevelt’s ‘Black Monday,’” when the Court announced three decisions relevant to FDR’s programs:  Humphrey’s Executor, Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of alleged misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [see, for example, Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06924.htm_________________The Discipline Book, - A 458 page guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Though, in truth, the feeling is probably mutual as well.With some justification, as I'm sure the counsel involved would admitm at least on their best days. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
SSgt ME took the razor with her when she left work that day. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:45 pm by admin
  On that note, employers should be aware of a prior Ninth Circuit decision in Humphrey v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Further, case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231]. [read post]