Search for: "HYATT v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 21-1526 Worlds Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 2:42 pm
United States, 393 F.3d 1277, 1281 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al, Docket No. 1:21-cv-00899 (E.D. [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, holding that requests for information by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to an individual are exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, holding that requests for information by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to an individual are exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:19 am
§ 145’s “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings” provision authorizes an award of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s attorneys’ fees? [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm
United States, 464 U.S. 16,23 (1983) (quoting United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Hyatt, 132 S. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Hyatt, 132 S. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
Hyatt to trademark law. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
United States and Morgan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
” United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Patent and Trademark Office decisions in patent cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
KapposThis case intrigued me from the start because it seemed rather odd that there should be a nonprecedential opinion in an appeal to the Federal Circuit necessitated by a completely adjudicated inter partes reexamination at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:54 am
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
This comes only days after the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused to grant reexamination of the patent in question. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:06 pm
One or more "examiners" in the United States Patent and Trademark Office look over your application and either accept or reject it, in whole or in part. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Hyatt, the Court considered whether an inventor can introduce new evidence in court that he could have (but did not) present to the Patent and Trademark Office, and if so, whether the court is nonetheless required to give deference to the Patent and Trademark Office’s prior decision. [read post]
