Search for: "Haag v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 8:19 am
centras V? [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
The documents filed by the parties in the appeal proceedings are numbered as follows:A1 Decision Edwards Lifesciences AG v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 2:59 pm
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
Alden v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:12 pm
The Rechtbank Den Haag, by judgment of 26 March 2021 – Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:15 am
” Haag-Streit AG v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 5:30 am
Amparada en esa ley, la Gobernadora Wanda Vázquez, declaró un estado de emergencia por Covid-19(23). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
The State has stated that the SyRI legislation contains sufficient guarantees to protect the privacy of everyone. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:32 pm
The bench makes the calls, notes the Ninth: let the players play the game.United States v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
SHELL PETROLEUM N.V. te Den Haag,3. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:35 am
So Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 5:29 am
The case is styled, Luis Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
While noting that it is for the referring court to make a determination in the specific case at hand, the AG stated that to this end "the referring court should carry out an overall assessment, taking into account the graphic representation and any descriptions filed at the time of application for registration, as well as other material relevant to identifying the essential characteristics of the contested mark, where applicable. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:16 am
These were the questions in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, C-174/15, a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Rechtbank Den Haag (District Court of The Hague, Netherlands). [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
This is illustrated in the 1993 case, State Farm Lloyd's v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Case C 379/14 TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd; Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV might have been one such case in the eyes of its parties and participants, though this Kat isn't so sure. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:02 am
But see Haag v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 2:39 am
Asser Instituut, Den Haag, presented on the protection of weaker parties in connection with forum selection and arbitration clauses. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
