Search for: "Hale v. Brown"
Results 141 - 160
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
A (Appellant) v Essex County Council & National Autistic Society (Intervener) [2010] UKSC 33 Supreme Court (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke) July 14 2010 The right to education under Article 2 Protocol 1 of the Convention was not breached by the delay in catering for the special educational needs of a child. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:41 am
The paper describes the university's efforts to limit the application of the Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm
Lord Roger and Lord Brown were of the same view, while Lady Hale thought the distinction between “disciplinary” and “precautionary” was unhelpful. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:19 am
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:23 pm
The paper describes the university’s efforts to limit the application of the Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Norris v United States [2010] UKSC 9 SC (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Judge, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr) 24 February 2010 In determining whether interference with an individual’s right to a family life was justified to achieve the aim of extradition, the court should not consider whether the circumstances were exceptional but should consider whether the consequences were exceptionally serious SUMMARY The appellant had… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
Re W (Children) [2010] UKSC 12 SC (Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr) March 3 2010 The facts of this case are set out in the report of the Court of Appeal judgment below. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 1:08 am
Wendell Brown, Defendant-Appellant.2009 WL 4909176(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:43 am
Lords Hope and Brown and Lady Hale refused permission to appeal on the ground that "the application did not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Baroness Hale did not expressly agree with anyone, but supported three points made in the other speeches. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
By a 3-2 majority their Lordships (Lords Hope, Carswell and Brown) held that she was not habitually resident (Baroness Hale and Lord Neuberger dissenting). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
REALTY real estate 1 Roman T Brzozowski TVCityUSA.com advertising 2 Roman T Brzozowski TvCityUSA Adv. 2 Tom Ripellino Metropolis Real Estate Broker/Owner 3 Charles Brown Chatre Appraisals Inc Real Estate Appraiser 1 Petar VIDEV A&I Broadway Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 3 Vlad Porter VB Porter & Company Real Estate Broker/Consultant 3 Kelvin Chan N/A Homebuyer 2 Enny Donaldson Fortune Property Foreclosure… [read post]
