Search for: "Hall v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2009, 1:42 pm
Status Spencer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 6:07 am
The district court said plaintiff had no case for this reason: "“While it is true that many industries are dominated by white men, being out-numbered or the lone minority in an office setting is not enough, without more, to give rise to a gender or race-based discrimination claim. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
§ 2679, and constitutional claims pursuant to Bivens v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
McNea v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
In one case, a Texas jury awarded $15,000 per hour in false imprisonment damages to the store customer and the award was upheld as reasonable on appeal. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to defendants on this claim and on various state-law claims that are not at issue on appeal. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am
Copyright Office, called the Copyright Claims Board. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
The Industrial Commission of Ohio allowed Smith’s claim for bilateral inguinal hernia. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm
The Guardian reports that the New South Wales clubs lobby has dropped its defamation claim against independent MP Andrew Wilkie who is an advocate of great regulation of the poker machine industry. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
OpenDemocracy has appealed the decision. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
See also Hall v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
Also promoted to the Court of Appeal in the same batch of ten are Sir Geoffrey Vos (remember United Airlines v United Airways, here, Lady Gaga v Moshi Monsters, here?) [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
Link to Court of Appeals Docket here ---> 01-15-00943-CV Background In their Second Amended Statement of Claim, the Parkers, pursuant to the rules of the Financial Industry National Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"),[1] initiated arbitration proceedings against IB. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* Le Monde parle - article about the unrest at the European Patent OfficeMerpel comments on an article published on Le Monde, reporting on the industrial unrest and social tensions within the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, July 29, 2008 Vann v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am
Held: Appeal dismissed. [read post]
