Search for: "Hamilton v. Municipal Court" Results 61 - 80 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit agreed with Silver’s contention that jury instructions in his trial were erroneous in light of the decision handed down in McDonnell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
On the one hand, Title III incorporates Section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code, on which courts generally rely to permit substantive consolidation. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:55 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The second, Title III of PROMESA, is a broad-based in-court restructuring regime that is modeled on Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Tags: Broker-dealers, Exchange Act, Financial institutions, Jurisdiction, Liability standards, Regulation SHO, SEC,Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Short sales, State law, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts Holding Activists and Proxy Advisory Firms Accountable? [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Hamilton initiated an Article 75 action challenging his dismissal by the District, seeking a court order directing his reinstatement to his former position with the District. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am by John McFarland
Another recent example is BCCA Appeal Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Lisa Soronen at the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Walter Olson at Cato at Liberty, Hera Arsen at Ogletree Deakins, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and Fisher and Phillips at its blog, In Mellouli v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:52 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
This penalty was described by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Keam v. [read post]