Search for: "Hamilton v. State of Maine" Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
To briefly recap, the main point at issue in Knick is whether the Court should overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:03 pm
Here's Mark Walsh at SCOTUSblog reporting on the big oral argument on the last day of the 2017 Term — Trump v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), including the requirement of a final decision. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am by Jeanine Cali
  Alexander Hamilton endorsed Pinckney in New England states, hoping to make him president. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am by Ilya Somin
The main point at issue in Knick was whether the Court should overrule Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Sandy Levinson
  This has happened in states ranging from California and Arizona to Maine. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm by Ilya Somin
Hamilton Bank, a 1985 decision that made it almost impossible to bring takings cases against state and local governments in federal courts. [read post]