Search for: "Handel v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Similarly, in SRB v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
Germany, for example, is not the only state with ambitions in this regulatory arena. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm
In the case of Brian Handel, D.M.D., P.C. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
V. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
The State has stated that the SyRI legislation contains sufficient guarantees to protect the privacy of everyone. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:27 pm
Handel’s Enters. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:25 am
C. v Zencolor Corp., 2015 WL 4206982, *6, 2015 US Dist LEXIS 90345, *14 (SD NY, July 10, 2015, No. 13- CV-5715 (JGK]) (finding that “allegations of improper billing-standing alone-[ did] not state a claim for legal malpractice,” where former client “[did] not allege that but for this improper billing, its patent applications would have been approved”); Byrne & Storm, P.C. v Handel, 2013 WL 2444092, *4, 2013 US Dist LEXIS 78708, *14-15… [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 11:56 pm
In an unpublished opinion, the appellate court affirmed a district court’s finding that the franchisor had a likelihood of success at trial and would be irreparably harmed absent a preliminary injunction barring the franchisee from setting up a competing ice cream parlor (Handel’s Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
In a recent case, Handel’s Homemade Ice Cream & Yogurt v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
Once jurisdiction applies, they must comply with the prudential requirements of those states. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:57 pm
The latest decision dealing with online jurisdiction comes in the shape of Bolagsupplysningen OÜ and Ingrid Ilsjan v Svensk Handel AB (Case C‑194/16), an online defamation case. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
This term the Supreme Court will be hearing a case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:24 am
” The cakeshop and DOJ rely heavily on Hurley v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:55 am
Svensk Handel AB; see our previous post here). [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:45 am
Svensk Handel AB, Case C-194/16). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
Frank Hoffmeister, Wider die German Angst – Ein Plädoyer für die transatlantische Handels- und Investitionspartnerschaft (TTIP)Steffen Hindelang, Repellent Forces: The CJEU and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Beiträge und BerichteFelix Würkert, Historische Immunität? [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
I read this passage as suggesting that the much-maligned “economic/non-economic” distinction in United States v. [read post]
