Search for: "Harding v. City of New York" Results 81 - 100 of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 3:10 am
Founded by two former New York County Assistant District Attorneys, the New York criminal lawyers at Crotty Saland PC represent clients accused of weapon crimes through New York City and the surrounding communities. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Young of counsel), for The City of New York, The Office of the Comptroller and the New York City Police Department (NYPD), respondents. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Young of counsel), for The City of New York, The Office of the Comptroller and the New York City Police Department (NYPD), respondents. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 4:32 pm by Zachary Eddington
In November 2012, Main Street Legal Services, a City University of New York legal clinic, submitted a FOIA request to the NSC seeking all documents related to the drone program and minutes for NSC meetings in 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:25 am by Ilya Somin
The court concluded that, because the DPPA requested information and “did not require state officials to assist in the enforcement of federal statutes,” it was consistent with the New York and Printz cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:19 am by Phillips & Associates
With regard to protections against employment discrimination, New York City law expressly includes gender identity and gender expression as protected categories, as do laws in many other cities and states. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Properly and narrowly understood, the decision of sanctuary jurisdictions to decline to provide certain kinds of enforcement help to federal immigration authorities should be, as I have written in several previous columns (including this one), protected by the so-called anti-commandeering principle reflected in New York v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Savvis v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 05751, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDebra Savvis sued the New York City Department of Education to recover damages for alleged unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex and a hostile work environment in violation of New York State’s Executive Law §296. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While a remedial statute is construed with greater liberality than is allowed with reference to a penal statute, it is nevertheless to receive a reasonable interpretation with a view of accomplishing the purpose intended as ruled in Matter of Anderlohr v City of New York. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
City of New York, which was decided on October 16, 2007. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:13 am by Jeremy Saland
Founded by two former Manhattan prosecutrs, Crotty Saland, LLP represents individuals accused of crimes throughout the New York City region. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]