Search for: "Hardwick v. Hardwick" Results 1 - 20 of 326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 2:34 am by sally
The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott highlights again the ongoing problems that can arise when unmarried couples separate and there is no clear agreement as to the ownership of their property interests.” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 2nd February 2012 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:57 am by sally
“In the recent decision in Taylor v Betterment Properties Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 250, the Court of Appeal has provided useful guidance on two questions arising under the Commons Registration Act 1965 and potentially of wider implication.” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 2nd May 2012 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:36 am by sally
” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 6th August 2012 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]
10 Feb 2003, 7:21 am
Hardwick, the 1986 case in which the Supreme Court refused to [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Hardwick stood as a precedent, blocking progress on gay rights in the federal courts, until it was overruled in 2003 in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:52 am by sally
The Supreme Court revisited the decision in Stack v Dowden and disagreed with the Court of Appeal: If the presumption of joint beneficial ownership is rebutted, the court can, in the absence of finding any intention as to the shares, impute to the parties an intention that their beneficial interest would be divided in a manner that the court considers fair.” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 9th November 2011 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The term “race” includes ethnicity for purposes of 42 USC 1981 and Title VIIVillage of Freeport and Andrew Hardwick v Barrella, USCA, Second Circuit, No. 14-2270-cv (L) et. al.Christopher Barrella sued the Village of Freeport and its former mayor, Andrew Hardwick, [Hardwick] alleging Hardwick violated 42 USC 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC 2000e, and the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law §290.… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:48 am by sally
“Morayo Fagborun Bennett says the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) decision in O’Brien v Ministry of Justice ‘sweeps away’ many of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) justifications for distinguishing between part-time and full-time judges. ‘The MoJ is going to have to think hard how it handles the case when it comes back to the Supreme Court,’ she says. ‘It doesn’t lend itself to any easy settlement and there are thousands eagerly… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:57 am by sally
Chris Camp considers employment status in discrimination law, in light, in particular, of the recent Supreme Court decision in Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40.” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 5th July 2012 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]