Search for: "Harmon v. Gordon" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm by Marissa Miller
” The editorial board of the Boston Herald expresses its disappointment that the Court refused to grant cert. in Harmon v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 10:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Comment: This is an implicit harmonization of the Ninth and Second Circuit approaches: the Second doesn’t use Rogers in title-v-title cases, but Empire said the Ninth would do so, but then Gordon’s “same use” reasoning is really title-v-title on steroids. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Parra, Advancing Reform at ICSID Julia Salasky & Corinne Montineri, UN Commission on International Trade Law and Multilateral Rule-making: Consensus, Sovereignty and the Role of International Organizations in the Preparation of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency David Gaukrodger & Kathryn Gordon, Inter-Governmental Evaluation of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Recent Work at the OECD-Hosted Freedom of Investment Roundtable Stephan W. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:16 am by Carolina Pina
The EGC bases its conclusions on article 1.2 of Regulation 510/2006 and the judgment by the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 September 2007, Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, case T-291/03 (link), which ruled: “Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2081/92, a PDO may also be constituted by a traditional non-geographical name designating a foodstuff originating in a region or specific place which… [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
’“ 3) International Investment Arbitration, the European Patent Office, and the Future Unified Patent Court by Thomas Musmann “Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:12 am by Simon Holzer
The Federal Supreme Court was of the opinion that Swiss lawmakers wanted to harmonize the Swiss law on SPCs with the laws in the EU. [read post]