Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon" Results 141 - 160 of 1,654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2022, 8:56 pm by Kurt R. Karst
He signaled that MDUFA V will impact pre-submissions with their goal of completing 90% within 70 days. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:54 am by Offit Kurman
Exempt entities include, among others, (i) most regulated financial institutions, including banks, credit unions, insurance companies, and broker-dealers, (ii) companies required to file reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, (iii) tax-exempt entities, (iv) subsidiaries of exempt entities, and (v) “large operating companies”. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 11:50 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The biggest advantage, though, would most likely be the harmonization of the law of international jurisdiction across the EU – which, from a German perspective, would come at a rather reasonable price. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Arizona courts have a responsibility to attempt to harmonize all of this state's relevant statutes. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
In August 2022, the Commission adopted an Implementing Decision with a mandate to CEN-CENELEC to draft harmonized standards to show compliance with essential requirements under the RED. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Perlin, Talia Roitberg Harmon and Haleigh Kubiniec (New York Law School, Niagara University and Niagara University) have posted 'The World of Illusion Is at My Door': Why Panetti v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 10:00 am by Alden Abbott
It was not until 21 years after passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act that the Supreme Court held that Section 1 of the act’s prohibition on contracts, combinations, and conspiracies “in restraint of trade” only covered unreasonable restraints of trade (see Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]