Search for: "Harp v. Harp"
Results 41 - 60
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 3:55 am
Plaintiff in McFadden v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
Simmons that the Harp rule could not survive intervening case law from the Supreme Court (Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
Simmons that the Harp rule could not survive intervening case law from the Supreme Court (Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
This question arises because according to the referring court, the to be trade marked shape consists of three essential features, two of which are technically necessary and one of which results exclusively from the nature of the goods themselves:the basic rectangular slab shape: results from the nature of the goods (Article 3(1)(e)(i)),the presence, position and depth of the grooves running along the length of the bar: necessary to obtain technical result (Article 3(1)(e)(ii)), the number of… [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to include evidence — Guilty plea by someone else Andrea Sheron Harps, the appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Harford County of manufacture of marijuana, possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and possession of marijuana. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:09 pm
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals recently decided Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:28 am
He is Big Harp George, an accomplished harmonica player. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
Supreme Court decision in Hoffman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
” And he quickly brought up a prior precedent (South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:22 am
Carter v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:37 am
One of his more recent articles on Oracle v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
”); Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:09 pm
In Rink v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
Case citation: Mavrix Photographs LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
Weiner harps on the fact that FRAP 35 identifies the creation of a circuit split as one possible reason a given case may present a question of “exceptional importance. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:16 am
The majority opinion treats with charity People v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:36 am
An earlier criminal excursion into the same dispute is at R. v. de Vos; R. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Touhy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:59 pm
The recent Ontario case of Ludchen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:30 am
Howard v. [read post]
