Search for: "Harp v. Harp" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Harp    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0291n.06 Parma v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
  The numberless hordes of my regular readers know that I’ve harped for years about the damage wrought by Westfield v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
This question arises because according to the referring court, the to be trade marked shape consists of three essential features, two of which are technically necessary and one of which results exclusively from the nature of the goods themselves:the basic rectangular slab shape: results from the nature of the goods (Article 3(1)(e)(i)),the presence, position and depth of the grooves running along the length of the bar: necessary to obtain technical result (Article 3(1)(e)(ii)),  the number of… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  You can certainly count on that last argument being the one the state harps on. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by Kashmir Hill
” The session included a fair amount of harping about how the animals are trained in the Biglaw outhouse… “Outhouse practice is a much different practice than in-house practice,” said Curt Kramer of Navistar. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:37 pm
More on this to follow.Not space law per se, but for you patent junkies, here's a recap of this week's Supreme Court decision in KSR v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:59 am
It's in the Wall Street Journal and here is the key portion:Defenders of the court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]