Search for: "Harp v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2017, 11:22 pm
Tomorrow the Supreme Court wil formally issue its mandate to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit based on last month's landmark decision in Apple v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:30 am
Steve Vladeck As is abundantly clear from the Supreme Court’s June 2011 decision in Stern v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
I think that the problem is less the OCC's intransigence than the tenacity of very bad, very old precedent -- the venerable McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:40 am
Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
In Bufkin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:53 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Pamela Coomer v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 6:29 pm
The only reason that I harp on conflicts is that the Third Edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (2011) improvidently started down this road, as have several federal district and state court judges, including the judges who sat on the First Department panel, which decided Weitz & Luxenberg P.C. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
Cacheris' most recent opinion in Signature Flight Support Corporation v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:54 am
Phil Bryant, School Prayer, Engel v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Lira v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
Travis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:49 am
Supreme Court, in the landmark case Furman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:23 am
Figeroa v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:09 pm
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals recently decided Johnson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
”); Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
Harp, et al (NFP) - Issues. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Touhy v. [read post]