Search for: "Harris, v. U.S.A."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
“The Chevron Deference” is a term derived from the landmark case decided on this day in history, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
The case in McBrayer v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
I have misgivings about where he and Kamala Harris want to go. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
” Professor Oh’s article is titled, “Born in the U.S.A.: Kamala Harris Is Eligible to Become Vice President. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:34 am
Aditya Bamzai, of Ortiz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission’s assumption of gatekeeper power over new methods of communication, “in the most important place [] for the exchange of views[,] … the ‘vast democratic forums of the Internet,’” violates the First Amendment; (2) whether the radical reinterpretation of the Communications Act of 1934 by the FCC is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
Ct. 1744, 1748 n.2 (2014) (decision based on legal erroris abuse of discretion); Harris v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
Adopted in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives, on a near party-line vote, passed a bill—“the Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2016”—that would, among other things, undo a major Supreme Court ruling of three decades ago, Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
App. 2010); Harris v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:44 am
Harris noted that the Supreme Court, in Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, as explained in the landmark 1984 Supreme Court ruling in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Harris, or in the best interest of society. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
HARRY M. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Kemp, supra, at 328-329; Crumbley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Synthes (U.S.A.), 587 S.E.2d 594, 595 (Ga. 2003) (applied to medical device). [read post]
