Search for: "Harris v. Reliable Reports Inc"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
“Jurisfiction” is a word coined by Jasper Fforde, author of the Tuesday Next series, one of the more sophisticated set of children’s works that has come to populate this post-Harry Potter era. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:04 am
Pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Magistrate Judge was to review the motion, analyze the arguments it made and the relevant law, and write a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) reporting to the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Judge Sarah Vance’s opinion in Burst v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Harris v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
[3] Harris v. comScore, Inc., 292 F.R.D. 579 (N.D.Ill. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Wyeth Inc., 77 Pa. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
But see DeLuca v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Harris – a case involving the reliability of testing protocols related to drug sniffing dogs (is more than a “certification” statement required); Chaidez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Santoro v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Harry Henderson. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
In Trkulja v Google Inc & Anor (No 2) [2010] VSC 490 the Supreme Court of Victoria struck out a number of defamatory imputations and ordered the provision of further particulars in a long running claim against Google. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IP Dragon),Chinese hotel liable for sales by shop: (IPKat)DenmarkGovernment report on counterfeiting and piracy: (Class 46)EuropeDSS case shows why EU leaders want one patent jurisdiction, but will patent owners? [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
* TrollTracker reports 137 patent cases. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Harris County Bail Bond Bd., No. 05-20714 A decision finding that a Texas statute restricting solicitation of potential customers denied bail bondsmen their First Amendment rights is affirmed in part and reversed in part where all but one of the restrictions violated the bondsmen's right to commercial speech. [read post]
