Search for: "Harris v. Walls et al" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2009, 9:51 am
Harris   Theoretical Implications of a Supreme Court Ruling in Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:49 am by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the Southern District of New York.In her complaint, Julie Taymor & Loh, Inc. v. 8 Legged Productions, LLC et al (Case No. 1:2011-cv-08002), the plaintiff alleges the musical's producers, Glen Berger, Jeremiah Harris and Michael Cohl, breached a contract that allegedly gave her approval rights over changes to the play's book and owe her royalties for performances since April when the snake-bit (radioactive spider-bit?) [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Harris by William Birdthistle on The Conglomerate Investment Indiscipline: A Behavioral Approach to Mutual Fund Jurisprudence by William Birdthistle Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal Decision in Jones, et al., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Walter Olson
Rainwater (Fifth Circuit 1977) and more (LaFave et al.), Walker v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Southern District of New York, defendants have introduced two new ways to rebut Basic Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Micheal Sanchez
Al. v. 1717 Bissonnet, L.L.C., Cause No. 2013-26155, 157th Judicial District, Harris County, Texas. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am by Venkat
Ingerman Smith LLP et al., CV 2012-0307 (ILG) (MDG) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am by Dan Harris
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]