Search for: "Harvey v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:48 pm
Peter Harvey & Seth I. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:00 am
United States, 2020 WL 7692766 (W.D.N.Y.). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
The dissenting opinion states, "Instead, the CCAs will have to resort to the procedures invented by United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:56 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:04 am
R v Harvey, heard 24 March 2015. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:24 pm
" The same it true with respect to layoffs of personnel in the unclassified service. * Source The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
R v Harvey, heard 24 March 2015. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
§ 105 that works of the United States government may not receive copyright protection, therefore also placing it in the public domain.However, as a copyright owned by a private individual, the Aboriginal flag is subject to the Australian standard duration of copyright protection - the period of Mr Thomas’s life plus 70 years - and will not otherwise enter the public domain until this period is over.Solutions? [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
Harvey, which I blogged about here. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
” Colorism in the United States is especially complex, Norwood adds. [read post]
