Search for: "Hatch v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
Application of the federal Hatch Act barring partisan political activities by certain State and municipal employees Juan Molina-Crespo v United States Merit Systems Protection Board, 547 F.3d 651 Juan Molina-Crespo served as the Executive Director of the Lorain County Children and Families First Council (“LCCFFC”), an Ohio government agency that is financed in part by the federal government. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Application of the federal Hatch Act barring partisan political activities by certain State and municipal employeesJuan Molina-Crespo v United States Merit Systems Protection Board, USCA 6th Circuit, Docket No. 07-3745Juan Molina-Crespo served as the Executive Director of the Lorain County Children and Families First Council ("LCCFFC"), an Ohio government agency that is financed in part by the federal government. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In contrast, observed the court, under the CBA an arbitrator has a range of disciplinary options that may be imposed on the wrongdoer that are much less severe than termination of employment.The New York State Bar Association has posted an article by Sung Mo Kim, Esq. addressing the impact of the Merit Systems Protection Board finding violations of the Hatch Act on the Internet at https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2020/03/HatchActKimMunicipalFall06.pdf.Other… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In contrast, observed the court, under the CBA an arbitrator has a range of disciplinary options that may be imposed on the wrongdoer that are much less severe than termination of employment.The New York State Bar Association has posted an article by Sung Mo Kim, Esq. addressing the impact of the Merit Systems Protection Board finding violations of the Hatch Act on the Internet at https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2020/03/HatchActKimMunicipalFall06.pdf.Other… [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
* Also, the political activities of State and municipal employees whose employment is federally financed, in whole or in part, may be further restricted by the federal Hatch Act [53 Stat. 1147].Essentially, the Hatch Act bars State and local officers and employees from being candidates for public office in a partisan election,** using official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the results of an election or nomination and directly or… [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Another straw appeared in the wind on April 6 of that year, when then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch[1] gave a strong and unusually strident speech before the spring meeting of the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section, singling out anticompetitive mergers for especially pointed criticism, and dismissing some recent proposed transactions as unworthy even of contemplation by the firms involved—a theme laced with scorn for antitrust counselors, their business clients, and the… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:26 am
Case citation: Bock & Hatch LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Nov. 5, 2015) (the Bankruptcy Code precluded an FDCPA claim for a time-barred proof of claim); Neal v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:06 am
Hatch Ltd. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
In April 2011, the United States Supreme Court provided a potential escape hatch for employers. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:33 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
Political party officials, others, barred from receiving court fiduciary appointmentsKraham v Lippman, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Docket No.06-2695 cvSection 36.2(c) of the Rules of the Chief Judge of the State of New York [22 NYCRR 36.2, et seq.] sets out a number of “disqualifications for appointment” as “guardians” or “receivers” by New York State courts. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:09 am
The case is entitled Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness USA Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
