Search for: "Hatch v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lundbeck A/S, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
It did not consider or endorse any specific legislation, but the pathway suggested was reasonably clear from the relentless criticism of economic writings, judicial opinions (including most Supreme Court antitrust opinions dating from General Dynamics), and other landmark scholarship of antitrust law and economics of the past half-century. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
Attorney General of CanadaDecision Date: February 21, 2021 The Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared section 91 of the Canada Elections Act, 2000 invalid. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
With good reason, the elected President is not subject to the Hatch Act. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
In cases like Pickering v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Superior Court Judge Shana Frost Matini rebuked Pack’s attacks against the OTF. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
Tibiotalar joint effusion with posterior superior capsule ganglion. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am
Before the 2016 election, Gill wanted to run as “a delegate for Bernie Sanders,” and talked to her supervisor, who spoke to his superior, and relayed back that a delegate did not run afoul of the Hatch Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Seen this before w/Hatch-Waxman w/communications about generics suggesting they were outdated or less effective. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 10:24 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has answered that question with a resounding “No, but…” In Chevalier v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:03 pm
The California Supreme Court’s August 29, 2019 decision in Pitzer College v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
The Court’s June 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
As explained by the district court in Nader v. [read post]
