Search for: "Hayes v. Price et al"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
(Lauren Hirsch, et. al., The New York Times). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
Brief in opposition of National Resources Defense Council, et al. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
MONADNOCK CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellees. 3rd District. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Price Foundation (WAPF). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Moreover, as the supply of legal services cannot be provided at the price of pirated services, the production and supply of legitimate content will also invariably over time not be able to meet the demand at that price. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
The price, however, of allowing the other side to discover the underlying data and materials of the author expert witness’s studies may be too high. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
