Search for: "Heard v. Frye"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 4:01 pm
On October 31, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the cases Lafler v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:58 am
On Wednesday, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 2:30 am
As previously reported, last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm
Lafler v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
The panel held: [T]he State may move to introduce HGN tests without the need for a Frye evidentiary hearing. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:32 am
On Monday I wrote about the legal legacy of Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:46 am
Frye, but haven’t mentioned the companion case, Lafler v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
(NY Murder Conviction Overturned for Denial of ID Expert) As previously reported, last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
Bear in mind, we're talking about such minimal competence as to meet the criteria of Strickland v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
In Lafler v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
Turning to what the experts over at Eyewitness Identification are saying: last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:08 am
The Court held that the expert evidence presented satisfied the scientific reliability test set forth in Frye v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:57 pm
One document that was generated but was out of my plan was “Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Frye-Mack Hearing” in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
John Fund v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
The court concluded that the DRE program is not generally accepted within the relevant scientific communities and that therefore would be excluded under the cases of Frye v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
The Court heard oral arguments in two cases yesterday. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Bachman v. [read post]
