Search for: "Held v. Pokorny"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2016, 1:14 pm
The DCA relied on Pokorny v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
While plaintiff cites to cases where a legal malpractice claim was held viable despite a settlement in the underlying action [Cohen v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
"] From Thursday's Appellate Court of Illinois decision in Pokorny v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
While plaintiff cites to cases where a legal malpractice claim was held viable despite a settlement in the underlying action (Cohen v Lipsig, 92 AD2d 536 [2d Dept 1983]; Lattimore v Bergman, 224 AD2d 497 [2d Dept 1996]; Mazzei v Pokorny, Schrenzel & Pokorny, 125 AD2d 374 [1986]), these cases are distinguishable as none relate to a claim where the attorneys pressured a client to enter into a settlement; rather the cases cited involve… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:45 am
In last month’s case (Parti v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
The Pokorny v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court agreed and held that the agreement was patently unethical and therefore illegal. [read post]
