Search for: "Hendrix v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
Keep On Rockin' In The Virtual World--Guitar Hero Videogame Does Not Infringe Gibson Guitar's Patent
3 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
Instead of acceding to Gibson’s demands, Activision filed a pre-emptive request for declaratory relief with the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Activision Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IPBiz),Sinorgchem v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 10:44 am
IndiaRam v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Jimmy Hendrix memorably (or not, depending on one’s sensibility) offered a “rendition” of the Star-Spangled Banner at Woodstock when he performed it aloud in 1969. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Hendrix, Partner at Arnall Golden & Gregory in Atlanta. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
