Search for: "Herrick v. Herrick" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 1:27 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
§230(c), for online providers that host third-party content: the Second Circuit’s decision in Herrick v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The allegations of wrongdoing against Feder, RESF, Goldberg, and Herrick Feinstein are equally deficient inasmuch as they fail to allege specific facts from which it could be reasonably inferred that Feder, RESF, Goldberg, and Herrick Feinstein acted with the requisite degree of scienter (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d 1224, 1225), and/or otherwise fail to allege specific facts from which it could be inferred that the alleged deceit was the proximate cause of any injury to… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm by ernst
Knowles tells the human story behind this historic case.West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:43 am by Janie Buckley and J. Alexander Lawrence
The strong protections afforded by Section 230(c) were recently reaffirmed by Judge Caproni of the Southern District of New York, in Herrick v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
Goldman twitted about the denial of cert in Herrick v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:00 pm by Dan Bressler
New York law requires disqualification for disclosure of information that “embrace[s] substantive issues related to the” action and that was “made in confidence” to facilitate the provision of legal services, as the Court of Appeals long held in Seeley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 11:21 am by Aaron Rubin and Scott Chen
As we noted in our recent post on the Second Circuit case Herrick v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Rule, Preserving Sacred Sites and Property Law, (August 7, 2023).Mark Satta, Commercial Discrimination as Religious Messaging in 303 Creative v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]